Back to blog

Chat 2.5.2014 Digital media law

February 11, 2014 - Posted in #wjchat archives , Web Journalism Posted by:

4:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Join us in 1 hour to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer + @kurtop

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


4:07 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Join us in 1 hour to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer + @kurtop

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


4:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
MT @scottleadingham: Interesting. NPR experiments with buidling “earworms” for social media: http://t.co/UxsRPMsp8u #wjchat #pubmedia

Joe O’Sullivan
@RapidCityJoe


4:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Join us in 1 hour to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer + @kurtop

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


4:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Join us in 1 hour to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer + @kurtop

Steven King
@steven_king


4:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Today at 5 PST on #wjchat: we’re talking new media + the law w/ @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti & @kurtopsahl. Send

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


4:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Attempting another Twitter chat! This time I’ll be participating in #WJchat for #NewhouseSM4 Apologizing now for all the upcoming tweets.

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


4:55 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
The #wjchat chat starts in 5 minutes. http://t.co/uiuHCayBso #ChatSalad

ChatSalad
@ChatSalad


4:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Getting ready to start #wjchat with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @kurtopsahl @LALincolnLawyer. The topic: new media & law.

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


4:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Join me to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer on #wjchat. Starting in 5 min

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


4:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Getting ready to start #wjchat with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @kurtopsahl @LALincolnLawyer. The topic: new media & la

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


4:59 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Getting ready to start #wjchat with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @kurtopsahl @LALincolnLawyer. The topic: new media & la

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


4:59 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Getting ready to start #wjchat with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @kurtopsahl @LALincolnLawyer. The topic: new media & la

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: Join me to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer on #wjchat. St

NCCapitols
@NCCapitols


5:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
And it’s that time again. Welcome to the 205th episode of #wjchat, a weekly discussion for web journalists. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:01 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
We’re focusing this week’s #wjchat on law + digital journalism, and we have a great panel of hosts!

wjchat
@wjchat


5:01 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Please welcome @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @LALincolnLawyer + @kurtopsahl. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:01 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Let’s get started! Please introduce yourself, respond to questions & share your knowledge! #DontJustBeALurker #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Please welcome @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @LALincolnLawyer + @kurtopsahl. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Hi everyone! I’m excited b/c this is my first twitter chat! I’m studying social media with @DR4WARD in #NewhouseSM4 #WJchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Hi my name is Samantha Sonner, I’m a senior at Syracuse University taking #NewhouseSM4 with @Dr4Ward and I am participating in the #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat @jacklerner @ellynangelotti @LALincolnLawyer @kurtopsahl Hi everyone! #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Buck Borasky, Frontier Programmer … I Am Not A Lawyer (IANAL) #wjchat

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Hello, happy to take part in the discussion. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Good evening – Aaron Hepker, online editor for KCRG-TV in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. #wjchat

Aaron Hepker
@ahepker


5:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
(REMINDER: It’s not too late to send us your Qs! Please direct to @wjchat) #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Hey all. Casey here. Teach at USFSP. What a terrific panel today. #wjchat

Casey Frechette
@cfrech


5:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
PROTIP: Spare non- #wjchat people by starting your reply with @wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
I’m Ellyn Angelotti, I teach about social media & law at @Poynter. I’m a journalist turned lawyer. http://t.co/cYCdDMnFFm #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Hello everyone, I am Kurt Opsahl, an attorney with @EFF. Great to be here on #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat We’re focusing this week’s #wjchat on law + digital journalism, and we have a great panel of hosts! #J205

Polly Irungu
@pollyirungu


5:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
OK. Let’s get started. Here comes the first question du jour. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Porter Haney, social polling expert, Las Vegas #wjchat

Porter Haney
@PorterHaney


5:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Alex in Silicon Valley here! I do social, content, editing and do my best not to break any *journalism* laws in the process #wjchat

Alex J. Martin
@amartinmedia


5:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q1A Who does the law consider to be a journalist? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Hi everyone! I am a sophomore at @univ_of_oregon studying @UOsojc. #wjchat #J205

Polly Irungu
@pollyirungu


5:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat how do you think twibel or libel on twitter or social media will increase in the coming year? #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@SamanthaSonner Ah, great question. We’ll talk about that later in the chat! #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: Join me to talk digital journalism + law with @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @lalincolnlawyer on #wjchat. St

Lisa M. Brownlee
@lmbrownlee1


5:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Kai from Minnesota, missed the last two chats but am glad to pop in again. Webdev/photog/reporter. #wjchat

Jun-Kai Teoh
@jkteoh


5:07 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Do tell us more. RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A1: To be a journalist, you just need to engage in journalism. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:07 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @scottleadingham: Interesting. Can audio go viral? NPR experiments with buidling “earworms” for social media: http://t.co/VSmHBmMVyb #w

wale ajayi
@walejay


5:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wj

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wj

wjchat
@wjchat


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wj

Becky Nagel
@beckynagel


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A1 When it comes to reporter’s privilege it varies by jurisdiction. @rcfp has a good guide on these laws: http://t.co/aqBCX9K9bI #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wj

Alex J. Martin
@amartinmedia


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A1 When it comes to reporter’s privilege it varies by jurisdiction. @rcfp has a good guide on these laws: http://t.co/a

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A1 When it comes to reporter’s privilege it varies by jurisdiction. @rcfp has a good guide on these laws: http://t.co/a

wjchat
@wjchat


5:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Then how about this question? Q1B What does the law consider “publishing?” Do tweets count? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:10 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat The law on who is a journalist is still lagging behind modern digital reality somewhat. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:10 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Working the night shift at #ABC15 tonight. Will check in between newscasts. Happy Wednesday everyone! #wjchat

Josh Frigerio
@JoshFrigerio


5:10 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Aloha #wjchat! Gene from @CivilBeat here! In Hawaii we lost our media shield law last year due to grappling over what defines us.

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A1B: “Publish” can have a lot of legal meanings. For purposes of defamation law, a tweet is a “publication.” #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchatA1-The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer @wjchat The law on who is a journalist is still lagging behind modern digital reality somewhat. #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1B: “Publish” can have a lot of legal meanings. For purposes of defamation law, a tweet is a “publication.”

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1B: “Publish” can have a lot of legal meanings. For purposes of defamation law, a tweet is a “publication.”

wjchat
@wjchat


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat The law on who is a journalist is still lagging behind modern digital reality somewhat. #wjchat

Mary Gazze-Arnold
@marygazze


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1B: “Publish” can have a lot of legal meanings. For purposes of defamation law, a tweet is a “publication.”

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@genepark That’s a big challenge. Defining who is a journalist rather than is the function of the work journalism. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Lici is late again. Digital & social media editor for @hburgamerican. Working and chatting, so I’ll be in and out. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Should we define journalism? MT @LALincolnLawyer The law generally considers … if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2: Many states apply the single publication rule online, which means publication when first posted #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Chris here. Absolute nobody in NC. Aspiring journalist/flagellant. Here to listen and learn (while mostly working) #wjchat

Chris
@crussellclark


5:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A1 When it comes to reporter’s privilege it varies by jurisdiction. @rcfp has a good guide on these laws: http://t.co/a

Ashley Jost
@ajost


5:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Then how about this question? Q1B What does the law consider “publishing?” Do tweets count? #wjchat

Porter Haney
@PorterHaney


5:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A2: Many states apply the single publication rule online, which means publication when first posted #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LiciBev Good to see you! #wjchat

Martha Kang
@Martha_Kang


5:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Ren from @Poynter @newsu here. It’s been a while but I couldn’t resist tonight’s awesome panel. #wjchat

Ren LaForme
@itsren


5:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Here comes Q2. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@kurtopsahl So, would the single publication rule apply to the first tweet and not retweets? #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Yep. RT @LALincolnLawyer @wjchat The law on who is a journalist is still lagging behind modern digital reality somewhat. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@itsren @cfrech @Poynter representin’! #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q2 How do the legal challenges surrounding digital journalism differ from those of traditional journalism? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q2 How do the legal challenges surrounding digital journalism differ from those of traditional journalism? #wjchat

KPLU Public Radio
@KPLU


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2: This means that blog post is not being constantly republished, for purposes of statute of limitation, retraction laws #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat The @EFF proposed we focus on defining the act of journalism instead, not journalist. #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Good question. RT @ellynangelotti @kurtopsahl So, would the single publication rule apply to the first tweet and not retweets? #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q2 How do the legal challenges surrounding digital journalism differ from those of traditional journalism? #wjchat

Alex J. Martin
@amartinmedia


5:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti In a single publication states. Also, rtweets would likely be protected under Section 230 #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A1 – The law generally considers a person a journalist if journalism is the primary thing the person does. #wj

Steffi S. Lee
@SteffiSLee


5:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2: The legal challenges are not much different. Copyright, trademark, defamation, privacy – all concerns still present. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:16 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@Martha_Kang And you! It seems like ages. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:16 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A2: The legal challenges are not much different. Copyright, trademark, defamation, privacy – all concerns st

wjchat
@wjchat


5:16 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Define journalism, not journalist in new shield law by @EFF http://t.co/nuQxVnoDSt #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:16 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A2: The legal challenges are not much different. Copyright, trademark, defamation, privacy – all concerns st

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
MT @PorterHaney: does a retweet constitute plagiarism? does a RT have the same legal repercussions as the OG. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q2 How do the legal challenges surrounding digital journalism differ from those of traditional journalism? #wjchat

Beatriz Valenzuela
@PTBeatriz


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A2: The legal challenges are not much different. Copyright, trademark, defamation, privacy – all concerns st

Beatriz Valenzuela
@PTBeatriz


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @GenePark: @wjchat Define journalism, not journalist in new shield law by @EFF http://t.co/nuQxVnoDSt #wjchat

Ren LaForme
@itsren


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2: Some specialized protections from defamation and copyright claims for info posted by third parties, but mostly same. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q: Are journalists primarily having legal issues due to social media these days, since SM keeps getting more & more popular? #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2 Digital journalist face similar legal challenges, but often without the resources and staffing of traditional media #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A2 Digital journalist face similar legal challenges, but often without the resources and staffing of traditional me

wjchat
@wjchat


5:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A1 Trend is to look at the newsworthiness of the subject matter rather than whether the journalist is institutional media #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A2 Digital journalist face similar legal challenges, but often without the resources and staffing of traditional me

Beatriz Valenzuela
@PTBeatriz


5:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q3A What are the most common legal mistakes you see digital journalists making? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A2: I agree @LALincolnLawyer, but more guidance for copyright and defamation in the context of sm. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A2: I agree @LALincolnLawyer, but we need more guidance for copyright and defamation in the context of sm. #wjchat #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Lack of attribution. #wjchat

Josh Frigerio
@JoshFrigerio


5:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A3: Copyright and trademark infringement. Not understanding what is and is not fair use. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A3: Copyright and trademark infringement. Not understanding what is and is not fair use. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LDeRosa7 @wjchat I think SM helps bring the issue to light faster because things can go viral in a few moments. #J205 #wjchat

Polly Irungu
@pollyirungu


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Section 230 immunity for information posted by others, but not the original poster. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti @LALincolnLawyer Are public social media posts considered fair use? #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat Section 230 immunity for information posted by others, but not the original poster. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@GenePark @ellynangelotti @LALincolnLawyer We’ve got that question coming up in a bit. :) #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q3B What are some solutions to fixing those legal mistakes? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat @ellynangelotti @LALincolnLawyer K. Not going anywhere. :) #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A3: Thinking everything is fair use. It’s not either. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@genepark It depends. Are sharing within the context of the social media site (e.g. RT-ing) or are you repub on another platform? #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat One way to help get up to speed on legal issues is @eff’s Legal Guide for Bloggers https://t.co/yOsG9o3nIC #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat I see a lot of young journalists taking great copyright liberties. Reposted copy/photos with minimal added commentary, esp. #wjchat

Ren LaForme
@itsren


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A2: I agree @LALincolnLawyer, but more guidance for copyright and defamation in the context of sm. #wjchat

Katherine Peach
@ktpeaches


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat One way to help get up to speed on legal issues is @eff’s Legal Guide for Bloggers https://t.co/yOsG9o3nIC #wjchat

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti Repub on another site, like Buzzfeed taking Instagram pictures of Rob Ford partying or whatnot. #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Awesome discussion going on around social journalism and legal issues right now on #wjchat – come join in!

Porter Haney
@PorterHaney


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A3B: Finding ways to educate all social media users about common legal challenges that usually journalists only had to worry about! #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A3B: Finding ways to educate all social media users about common legal challenges that usually journalists only had to

wjchat
@wjchat


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A3B: Have lawyer explain these legal doctrines. Old ounce of prevention worth pound of cure stuff. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@pollyirungu @wjchat That is a great point! Hoping to never make 1 of those mistakes when I get into journalism after graduation #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @PorterHaney: Awesome discussion going on around social journalism and legal issues right now on #wjchat – come join in!

Media Law inthe News
@USCMediaLaw


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A3B: Have lawyer explain these legal doctrines. Old ounce of prevention worth pound of cure stuff. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A3 I see some digital journalists occasionally forget about verifying information and/or making sure source is legit. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@genepark Then the four factors of fair use would apply (more to come on that later) #howsthatforatease. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Top mistake in digital journos reporting on law is not reading the actual court papers cases they are reporting on. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti @genepark #whatapro #wjchat

Martha Kang
@Martha_Kang


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Top mistake in digital journos reporting on law is not reading the actual court papers cases they are reporting o

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @PorterHaney: Awesome discussion going on around social journalism and legal issues right now on #wjchat – come join in!

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q4A Let’s talk about fair use (ahem, @genepark!). When is something fair use? When is it not? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q3A Stated more broadly, top mistake in digital journos is not checking original sources. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@Martha_Kang @ellynangelotti Shes moderating herself. Love it. #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A3A: Most common mistake any journalist makes, digital or old school, is laziness and no attention to detail. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@lisaborodkin Agreed! Or not asking Qs when they don’t understand a law or complicated issue (or oversimplifying it incorrectly) #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@JoshFrigerio @wjchat As a journ student I’m learning when’s best to attribute, or when it’s not necessary. But it’s important! #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:27 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@lisaborodkin good point! and social media just allows people to do that faster #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:27 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: A3A: Most common mistake any journalist makes, digital or old school, is laziness and no attention to detail. #wjchat

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q1A Who does the law consider to be a journalist? #wjchat

Ashley Ormon
@AshOrmon


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4A: Fair uses are uses like criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, research, & parody. Court look at 4 factors #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q3A There’s still a lot of “if it’s on the internet I can use it, right?” out there. No, you can’t. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A4A: Fair uses are uses like criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, research, & parody. Court look at 4 f

wjchat
@wjchat


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A3: online post about Richard Jewell movie, said Jewell was a reporter. No, he was security guard. Nanosecond to confirm. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat Q3A There’s still a lot of “if it’s on the internet I can use it, right?” out there. No, you can’t. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q3A Stated more broadly, top mistake in digital journos is not checking original sources. #wjchat

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A4A: Fair uses are uses like criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, research, & parody. Court look at 4 f

Waldy Michelle Diez
@_waldy


5:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Preach RT @jacklerner: @wjchat Q3A There’s still a lot of “if it’s on the internet I can use it, right?” out there. No, you can’t. #wjchat

Monique Beech
@moniquebeech


5:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat @GenePark There is a 4-part test. @EFF applied them the Goldieblox v. Beastie Boys case. https://t.co/fl2DDYgQPz #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat In terms of common mistakes, is poor/insufficent verification necessarily a legal issue, or more an ethical one? #wjchat

Casey Frechette
@cfrech


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner @wjchat Q3A There’s still a lot of “if it’s on the internet I can use it, right?” out there. No, you can’t. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A3A: Many mistakes can be prevented w/solid reporting i.e. avoid pub false statements by backing up bold statements w/multi sources #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat @GenePark There is a 4-part test. @EFF applied them the Goldieblox v. Beastie Boys case. https://t.co/fl2DDYgQPz

wjchat
@wjchat


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
I get caught up on credits – is Tweet handle or link back to original sufficient? #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
QT @wjchat MT @PorterHaney: does a retweet constitute plagiarism? does a RT have the same legal repercussions as the OG. #wjchat

Dan Nguyen
@dancow


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q4B Are things on social media like profile images fair use? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat @GenePark There is a 4-part test. @EFF applied them the Goldieblox v. Beastie Boys case. https://t.co/fl2DDYgQPz

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat Q3A There’s still a lot of “if it’s on the internet I can use it, right?” out there. No, you can’t. #wjchat

Jenn Sheppard
@no1jenn


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn82GzuW4x #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A4A: Fair use case by case. 4 factors but really 2: What new did you give us, was work taken hurt? Give lots, hurt little: Fair #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

Ren LaForme
@itsren


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Fair use permits courts to avoid rigid application of the copyright statute when it would stifle creativity/innovation #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4B No. It’s important for everyone in your newsroom to be aware of each social network’s terms of service. #wjchat

Justin Karp
@jskarp


5:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

wjchat
@wjchat


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti @lisaborodkin Q3A–Good points! Those are 2 easy mistakes that I hope I never make once I start reporting. #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

NewsU E-Learning
@newsu


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Our rule is if public figure, yes. Private citizen? Not without permission first. We always have a conversation about it #wjchat

Josh Frigerio
@JoshFrigerio


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat One way to help get up to speed on legal issues is @eff’s Legal Guide for Bloggers https://t.co/yOsG9o3nIC #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4B: Case by case, no set answer. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuYis #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuY

wjchat
@wjchat


5:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
MT @ellynangelotti A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (@newsu) http://t.co/pbJJ1ESadv #wjchat #wjchat

Dorrine Mendoza
@AssignmentDesk1


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @PorterHaney: Awesome discussion going on around social journalism and legal issues right now on #wjchat – come join in!

Pocono Record
@PoconoRecord


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

JP
@jessicaplautz


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuY

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

Coni Grebel
@conigreb


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat Fair use permits courts to avoid rigid application of the copyright statute when it would stifle creativity/innovat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4: All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuYis #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner great! I will definitely keep this close by #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat A4: All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUX

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A4: Fair use is a flexible doctrine, so it’s hard to know how a court would rule, but thinking through the 4 factors is very helpful #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat A4: All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUX

Mary Gazze-Arnold
@marygazze


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Fair use is a flexible doctrine, so it’s hard to know how a court would rule, but thinking through the 4 factors is

wjchat
@wjchat


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jskarp @wjchat A4B No. It’s important for everyone in your newsroom to be aware of each social network’s terms of service. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q Does mainstream news outlets retweeting a user photo of breaking news count as attribution or fair use for breaking news? #wjchat

Porter Haney
@PorterHaney


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jskarp A4B No. It’s important for everyone in your newsroom to be aware of each social network’s terms of service. #wjchat #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q4B Not inherently. The social media platform uses it under a license. There is no implied fair use to a 3rd party to scrape #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: A3A: Most common mistake any journalist makes, digital or old school, is laziness and no attention to detail. #wjchat

Ashley Ormon
@AshOrmon


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q4B Not inherently. The social media platform uses it under a license. There is no implied fair use to a 3rd part

wjchat
@wjchat


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: A3A: Most common mistake any journalist makes, digital or old school, is laziness and no attention to detail. #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q5 Re: Courtney Love’s Twibel lawsuit (http://t.co/HPrYhVcgbS) can I commit libel on social media? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuY

Kim Newsome
@KimNewsome


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Josh Stearns here. Press Freedom Director for @freepress – great topic tonight. #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4B: You can make a fair use of a profile image – such as a use for criticism and commentary. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q5 Re: Courtney Love’s Twibel lawsuit (http://t.co/HPrYhVcgbS) can I commit libel on social media? #wjchat

Pocono Record
@PoconoRecord


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A4: Attribution is not a fair use factor. Plagiarism and copyright are like cousins, but not the same thing. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LiciBev: @wjchat A3 I see some digital journalists occasionally forget about verifying information and/or making sure source is legit.

Monique Beech
@moniquebeech


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Plagiarism has become really rampant too with blogs. I’ve seen my work on the front pages of websites without attribution. #WJChat

Ashley Ormon
@AshOrmon


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns Oh good! The wisdom in the room has arrived! :) #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @SarahMulvz: RT @LALincolnLawyer: A3A: Most common mistake any journalist makes, digital or old school, is laziness and no attention to

Ellen Rolfes
@ellenmhr


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5: Yes. Social media just another medium of publishing statements, does not change fundamental defamation law. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Attribution is not a fair use factor. Plagiarism and copyright are like cousins, but not the same thing. #wjchat

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A5: Yes. Social media just another medium of publishing statements, does not change fundamental defamation la

wjchat
@wjchat


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q5: The answer is yes, but the challenge I see going forward is now that everyone is a publisher is litigation the best remedy? #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2 I dive into some of the legal challenges for digital journalism in this report: http://t.co/676JU2tZWs (#wjchat PDF link)

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5: There was nothing new in the Courtney Love suit, many defamation suits for social media before. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@PorterHaney @wjchat QA4 case by case, but when a major news outlet removed attribution from a Twitpic, it was a DMCA vioaltion. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Tweeting is still voicing an opinion, might be text but doesn’t change intent. #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A5: Yes. Social media just another medium of publishing statements, does not change fundamental defamation la

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4b yes they are if they are public #wjchat

Alex Romano
@alexromano


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat A2 I dive into some of the legal challenges for digital journalism in this report: http://t.co/676JU2tZWs (#wjchat P

wjchat
@wjchat


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat A2 I dive into some of the legal challenges for digital journalism in this report: http://t.co/676JU2tZWs (#wjchat P

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@AshOrmon I hate when I see my work used without credit. You would think it is common sense. #wjchat #J205

Polly Irungu
@pollyirungu


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner good answer! What about when news media uses it on air? #wjchat

Porter Haney
@PorterHaney


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat A2 I dive into some of the legal challenges for digital journalism in this report: http://t.co/676JU2tZWs (#wjchat P

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q4B: The fact that the images are public makes some difference in fair use analysis, but really depends on how you use them. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @SarahMulvz Tweeting is still voicing an opinion, might be text but doesn’t change intent. #wjchat #J205

Polly Irungu
@pollyirungu


5:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5 I think libel on social is fair game it’s new territory for the courts to handle but if damage can be proven…#wjchat

Alex Romano
@alexromano


5:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns @wjchat @freepress Thanks for joining. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5: Social media publication might lend more to “opinion” defense but if making a statement of fact = libel. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti great answer. Hadn’t considered “everyone a publisher” in this context #wjchat

Dorrine Mendoza
@AssignmentDesk1


5:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A5: Social media publication might lend more to “opinion” defense but if making a statement of fact = libel.

wjchat
@wjchat


5:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5 Oh yeah, libel can (and I’m sure it does) happen on social media, so think hard about what you say/how you say it. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat AU center for social media created this interactive on Fair Use with @TakePart and @hitRECordJoe http://t.co/DWVPEw62k4 #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat #wjchat If you can maliciously publish false & damaging statements in <140 characters, color me impressed. But I’m still suing you.

Stephanie Levy
@stephanie_levy


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @stephanie_levy: @wjchat #wjchat If you can maliciously publish false & damaging statements in <140 characters, color me impressed. But

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Context is critical for defamation claims. Social media posts are often more like an opinion. But not immune from claims. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat A4: All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUX

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5: Love case called first “Twibel” *trial*, but certainly not first Twitter lawsuit. Not even Courtney’s first, actually. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Bill Cannon, digital dir. for @jconline jumping in late after some more snow tromping. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat AU center for social media created this interactive on Fair Use with @TakePart and @hitRECordJoe http://t.co/DWVPEw6

wjchat
@wjchat


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A2: harder to fair use things on broadcast or on a news orgs digital platforms when it comes to new media, u need clearance #wjchat

Alex Romano
@alexromano


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti At one point I was talking with some schools about creating a journalist guide to social media Terms of Service. #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q5 One can absolutely commit libel on social media. I have gotten defamation judgments for social media statements #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LiciBev: @wjchat A5 Oh yeah, libel can (and I’m sure it does) happen on social media, so think hard about what you say/how you say it.

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LiciBev: @wjchat A5 Oh yeah, libel can (and I’m sure it does) happen on social media, so think hard about what you say/how you say it.

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:40 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns You’re full of resources! Thank you! :) #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:41 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A5: Agreed. Instead of suing for defamation, wouldn’t it be more effective to fight defamatory speech with a social media campaign? #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:41 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat AU center for social media created this interactive on Fair Use with @TakePart and @hitRECordJoe http://t.co/DWVPEw6

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:41 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A4B: Correct Jack, so publishing an unpublished work very unlikely to be a fair use. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:41 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A5: Agreed. Instead of suing for defamation, wouldn’t it be more effective to fight defamatory speech with a social med

wjchat
@wjchat


5:41 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns @ellynangelotti That’s a great idea. Sorely lacking. #wjchat

Ren LaForme
@itsren


5:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Re: twibel, Does Loves claim that she thought she was sending a private message have any bearing? #wjchat

Casey Frechette
@cfrech


5:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@PorterHaney Would depend on how used, but usually in that context it’s fair use (transformative + no market) #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jsource @cjffjc: Great #wjchat thread tonight on legal issues and digital, incl. fair use. Would love to see you guys look at Cdn rules

Monique Beech
@moniquebeech


5:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti @wjchat A5: Always agree that the answer for bad speech is more speech. :) #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:42 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns Great idea about the journalist guide to social media terms of service — they change so often! #weshouldtalk #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @ellynangelotti @wjchat A5: Always agree that the answer for bad speech is more speech. :) #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat All journos should have the Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journalists close at hand! http://t.co/YDUXEXuY

Jonathan Chase
@johnochase


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @ellynangelotti @wjchat A5: Always agree that the answer for bad speech is more speech. :) #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jskarp agreed but there can be an argument for fair use and w/Facebook one can have many public profile photos #wjchat

Alex Romano
@alexromano


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer Oh, I would certainly not go that far. Many letters, manuscripts, leaked docs, etc. are fairly used all the time. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @AssignmentDesk1: MT @ellynangelotti A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (@newsu) http://t.co/pbJJ1ESa

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Checking in to #wjchat

Shauna Stuart
@ShaunaReporter


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Im on a favoriting frenzy the past few minutes. I love #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:43 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat sorry I’m tardy for the party. Jumping in now #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:44 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @wjchat. Tell that to the Harper & Row case. :) #wjchat.

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:44 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@cfrech @wjchat Q5 Intent is not an element of a defamation claim, so no. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:44 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Not if owner can be contacted, credited+compensated / @wjchat Let’s talk about fair use. When is something fair use? When is it not? #wjchat

David Clinch
@DavidClinchNews


5:44 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @wjchat Or the Monge case from the Ninth Circuit. #wjchat.

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:44 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

Stephanie Levy
@stephanie_levy


5:45 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @pollyirungu: RT @SarahMulvz Tweeting is still voicing an opinion, might be text but doesn’t change intent. #wjchat #J205

Taryn Wilkerson
@ViciousVibrato


5:45 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@GenePark Good thing #wjchat hearts you, too, so no #awkward http://t.co/N72VoTP3qA

Martha Kang
@Martha_Kang


5:45 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer @wjchat Many uses are easily distinguishable from Harper & Row! Better Q: Did Campbell effectively overrule it? #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:45 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q6 Can you be held liable if you RT content that violates copyright? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:46 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@moniquebeech good point — online/sm make international laws more relevant and choice of law issues more prevalent. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:46 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @DavidClinchNews: Not if owner can be contacted, credited+compensated / @wjchat Let’s talk about fair use. When is something fair use? W

wjchat
@wjchat


5:46 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @wjchat A2 I dive into some of the legal challenges for digital journalism in this report: http://t.co/676JU2tZWs (#wjchat P

Clydeen McDonald
@ClydeenMcDonald


5:46 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
2wjchat @ellynangelotti QA5 Main reason for bringing a defamation suit would be to get the page removed from search engine index #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A6 Retweeting a link to an infringement should not lead to liability – does not make a copy #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A6: Interesting – but didnt they try that w/ illegal downloading already? #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @wjchat Depends on facts, but unpublished would be my first red flag. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A6 Retweeting a link to an infringement should not lead to liability – does not make a copy #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A5-absolutely. If you’re a journalist, you’re a journalist on Twitter too #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat #wjchat A6 Wouldn’t your RT just be pt. of the dissemination that makes the original copyright violation bad in the 1st place?

Stephanie Levy
@stephanie_levy


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@DavidClinchNews Agreed. Regardless of fair-use, we should try to contact person & give credit when using social media content. #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer Good point. Monge is tougher, but also wrongly decided. Privacy interests of plaintiff should not be a factor. :) #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:47 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ONA: Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/JX46djx2EJ Deadline 2/21 #wjch

Ellen Rolfes
@ellenmhr


5:48 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Good question! RT @wjchat Q6 Can you be held liable if you RT content that violates copyright? #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:48 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A6: I’d hope one could make a reasonable defense that, without knowledge of the source, the RTer is not liable. #wjchat #ImNoLawyer

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:48 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A6: Retweeting link probably not an infringement, but facts could lead to an inducement theory under Grokster. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer @wjchat Agreed. Absolutely cannot ignore published/unpublished. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer Could you define inducement theory? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@DavidClinchNews And if you ask/get permission, you get benefits of the original creator sharing your work with their community too! #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @wjchat Next time I’m in front of the Ninth Circuit, I’ll let you tell them they were wrong. :) #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti The idea was sparked by the changes. The hope would be to choose the ones journos use most and then track changes. #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat #wjchat A6 – @buzzfeed has a “quiz” that shows how being a rude RT’er makes copyright more complicated ;-) http://t.co/T27sDx7j2e

Stephanie Levy
@stephanie_levy


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q6 In general, it’s hard to see any liability from Retweeting – it’s already published and already attributed. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:49 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Great point RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A6 Retweeting a link to an infringement should not lead to liability – does not make a copy #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat If I embed these tweets in a column about fair usage and media law, please dont sue me. ^_^ #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Actively inducing or encouraging others to engage in infringment could be a problem. Focus of new Gawker lawsuit. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A4A: Fair uses are uses like criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, research, & parody. Court look at 4 f

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Is there blanket fair-use protection if using material in the classroom? #wjchat

Ken Carpenter
@KenCarpenter


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat Actively inducing or encouraging others to engage in infringment could be a problem. Focus of new Gawker law

wjchat
@wjchat


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat If you know if’s violating copyright, include that point in your RT. A RT is a way of sharing info. Share it the right way #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q6 More interesting question is if linking to infringing matter can be inducement. That’s Tarantino v. Gawker. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer @wjchat I’d love to. Let’s co-counsel! :) #dreamteam #greatminds #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
For the #wjchat crowd, see what ONA is doing on the legal front for digital journalists at http://t.co/I3ckW5zHk4.

Joshua Hatch
@hatchjt


5:50 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns Yes, “fair use” should only be absolute last resort for using someone else’s content. And only for the public good. #wjchat

David Clinch
@DavidClinchNews


5:51 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @hatchjt: For the #wjchat crowd, see what ONA is doing on the legal front for digital journalists at http://t.co/I3ckW5zHk4.

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


5:51 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @wjchat Deal! #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:51 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @hatchjt: For the #wjchat crowd, see what ONA is doing on the legal front for digital journalists at http://t.co/I3ckW5zHk4.

wjchat
@wjchat


5:51 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @hatchjt: For the #wjchat crowd, see what ONA is doing on the legal front for digital journalists at http://t.co/I3ckW5zHk4.

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:51 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellenmhr @jskarp @wjchat right. Just because it’s on social media, doesn’t mean permissions can be overlooked #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @CShalby: @ellenmhr @jskarp @wjchat right. Just because it’s on social media, doesn’t mean permissions can be overlooked #wjchat

Justin Karp
@jskarp


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat not at all, in my opinion, I think that’s absurd; unless there’s malicious or malice with the intent to harm #wjchat

Alex Romano
@alexromano


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ONA: Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/JX46djx2EJ Deadline 2/21 #wjch

Brad Devereaux
@BradDevero


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
.@stephanie_levy @wjchat #wjchat could one argue that a “RT” is different than a retweet? Retweet shares, “RT” w/ or w/o addition a copy?

Brett Fera
@brettfera


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@CShalby definitely a good tip! #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:52 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A6: Tweets are so short that it’s hard for one tweet to be copyrightable. Harder Q is inducement. #whatlincolnsaid #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


5:53 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A6 No more than a reader reading the same content. You’re not the creator, however it’s best to retweet useful info.#wjchat

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


5:53 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q7 What’s the safest form of social media correction, legally-speaking? Delete? Apologize? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:54 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7: Deleting does nothing, you can try but better follow up w/ apology after. Screenshots never die. #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:54 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jacklerner @LALincolnLawyer @wjchat We should do an amicus curie brief for some case. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:54 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LiciBev: RT @jskarp @wjchat A4B No. It’s important for everyone in your newsroom to be aware of each social network’s terms of service.

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


5:54 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7: Depends on circumstance. But don’t bury the correction. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:54 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A7: Depends on circumstance. But don’t bury the correction. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:55 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@jcstearns @DavidClinchNews right. Ppl sometimes forget to be human on Twitter. If you find something IRL, you’d ask before taking #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:55 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat I think that it could possibly be good to do both #wjchat

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


5:55 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistake. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@SarahMulvz @wjchat “Screenshots never die” could be a new bumper sticker for the social media age. #wjchat

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q7 Depends on what the complainer/person affected wanted. Takedown, retraction – can vary. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistake. #wjchat

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q7 Depends on what the complainer/person affected wanted. Takedown, retraction – can vary. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Delete so incorrect info isn’t floating around (someone may just see that). Send corrected tweet noting it’s corrected tweet #wjchat

Amy Friedenberger
@AJFriedenberger


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Good Q. via @wjchat Q7 What’s the safest form of social media correction, legally-speaking? Delete? Apologize? #wjchat

Meena Thiruvengadam
@Meena_Thiru


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @SarahMulvz @wjchat “Screenshots never die” could be a new bumper sticker for the social media age. #wjchat

Brad Lewis
@BLewis2080


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat I love what @washingtonpost @tjortenzi did yesterday http://t.co/tajfU4cUL1 transparency is key #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


5:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @hatchjt: For the #wjchat crowd, see what ONA is doing on the legal front for digital journalists at http://t.co/I3ckW5zHk4.

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be transparent. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@DavidClinchNews @jcstearns Fair use is not just last resort. You can criticize a book, movie, person, without asking first. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

wjchat
@wjchat


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7 Besides follow the Terms of Use, don’t delete but reference and clarify with more information to your followship. #wjchat

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @DavidClinchNews Agreed. Regardless of fair-use, we should try to contact person & give credit when using social media conte

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


5:57 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Speaking of, did anyone see the epic s***fit Twitter had over Stephen King last night? Perfect example. #wjchat

Sarah Mulvey
@SarahMulvz


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7: Some states have retraction statutes – this can limit damages and avoid suits. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A7: Some states have retraction statutes – this can limit damages and avoid suits. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7: Key is not to ignore complainer, that always makes things worse. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@NewsCannon #wjchat Also – be sure your correction reaches every platform that might have spread the error. For ex. http://t.co/jAxVAzaGqj

Josh Stearns
@jcstearns


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

Meena Thiruvengadam
@Meena_Thiru


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
For sure. RT @ellynangelotti Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistake. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


5:58 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @NewsCannon #wjchat Also – be sure your correction reaches every platform that might have spread the error. For ex. http://t

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:59 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jcstearns: @SarahMulvz @wjchat “Screenshots never die” could be a new bumper sticker for the social media age. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


5:59 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistake. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


5:59 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Acknowledge you were wrong, screenshot it for records. Then delete tweet so ppl don’t share wrong information #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat As a practical matter, many people just want a correction. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat As a practical matter, many people just want a correction. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LiciBev: For sure. RT @ellynangelotti Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistak

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


6:00 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Think before you post!! internet = infinite #NewhouseSM4 MT @SarahMulvz: @wjchat Deleting does nothing, Screenshots never die. #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


6:01 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti @wjchat Or put another way, juries kill you when you don’t own up to mistakes! #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LALincolnLawyer @ellynangelotti @wjchat So, wait, WWJD is “What would a jury do?” #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Gotta run! I’ll catch up with rest of #wjchat later. Thanks @wjchat @lisaborodkin @jacklerner @ellynangelotti @lalincolnlawyer @kurtopsahl

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A4: Here’s an interactive flow chart to help people navigate fair use (it’s in this free @newsu course) http://t.co/Cn8

Lori Lewis
@lorilewis


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @ellynangelotti @wjchat Or put another way, juries kill you when you don’t own up to mistakes! #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A7 Some retraction statutes may not apply to tweets etc. In CA it applies to “newspapers,” definition somewhat unclear. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LiciBev @wjchat @lisaborodkin @jacklerner @ellynangelotti @lalincolnlawyer @kurtopsahl Thanks for stopping by! #wjchat

Martha Kang
@Martha_Kang


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q7 Certain forms of libel can be embarassing – some subjects prefer anonymity/don’t want SEO populated with the corrections #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:02 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat A7 Some retraction statutes may not apply to tweets etc. In CA it applies to “newspapers,” definition somewhat uncl

wjchat
@wjchat


6:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LiciBev @wjchat @jacklerner @ellynangelotti @LALincolnLawyer @kurtopsahl Thanks for joining Lici. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@NewsCannon @Martha_Kang @lisaborodkin Thanks! Wish I had more time to stick around. #wjchat

Lici Beveridge
@LiciBev


6:04 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

Jonathan Chase
@johnochase


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@SamanthaSonner thanks! #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Here’s a couple other media law primers created by @dsardia for @newsu: http://t.co/27GkIDqem0 & http://t.co/TUrb0v0PUK #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: @wjchat Here’s a couple other media law primers created by @dsardia for @newsu: http://t.co/27GkIDqem0 & http://t.co/TU

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: @wjchat Here’s a couple other media law primers created by @dsardia for @newsu: http://t.co/27GkIDqem0 & http://t.co/TU

wjchat
@wjchat


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q8 Do we really need to read the social networks’ TOS agreements? It’s not like we can say “no,” right? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:05 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: @wjchat Here’s a couple other media law primers created by @dsardia for @newsu: http://t.co/27GkIDqem0 & http://t.co/TU

David Brandt!
@DavidBrandtWho


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Everyone needs a standing policy for SM corrections just as we do for print or TV. Be fair, be consistent, be trans

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8: Better to fix Terms of Service law than expect everyone to read and understand the TOS. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8 You had better have at least one person on your staff that’s well versed in the TOS for all platforms. #wjchat

Justin Karp
@jskarp


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jskarp: @wjchat A8 You had better have at least one person on your staff that’s well versed in the TOS for all platforms. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A8: Better to fix Terms of Service law than expect everyone to read and understand the TOS. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A7: Depends on circumstance. But don’t bury the correction. #wjchat

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


6:06 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @DavidClinchNews: @jcstearns Yes, “fair use” should only be absolute last resort for using someone else’s content. And only for the publ

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:07 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wchat. A8: You can choose not to use the service. :) #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:07 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@kurtopsahl @wjchat A8 I agree. There should be one really great impact case about TOS. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8: Law re binding nature of complicated terms of service murky. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: Q7: Transparency is a very important journalistic value. People value when you own up to a mistake. #wjchat

Marina Hendricks
@mhendwv


6:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8: #whatkurtsaid TOS law is bunk bc they are generally upheld. If you’re a professional org, though, you’d better read ’em. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:08 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @jacklerner: @wjchat A8: #whatkurtsaid TOS law is bunk bc they are generally upheld. If you’re a professional org, though, you’d better

wjchat
@wjchat


6:09 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat On the off chance that a new social network comes around with questionable TOS, I think it’s worth the boring time to read #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:10 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A8: Law re binding nature of complicated terms of service murky. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:10 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: @wjchat Here’s a couple other media law primers created by @dsardia for @newsu: http://t.co/27GkIDqem0 & http://t.co/TU

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q8 Facebook e.g. solicited user input on privacy policy changes. Not a high % voted. But everyone has a choice. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q8 Facebook e.g. solicited user input on privacy policy changes. Not a high % voted. But everyone has a choice. #

wjchat
@wjchat


6:11 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8: You are making an agreement to terms. Would you sign a long doc just b/c someone said “trust me?” Read it. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8: Sometimes people do say no. Instagram changed when enough protested TOS terms http://t.co/T0LjVJegF2 #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A8 Not even the social networks read them–FTC had to ORDER FB to stop lying to their users & required 20 yrs of monitoring. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A8: Sometimes people do say no. Instagram changed when enough protested TOS terms http://t.co/T0LjVJegF2 #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A8: That goes for any fine print. I’m planning a wedding, and I’ve been striking through clauses in vendor contracts right and left! #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@NewsCannon @wjchat Q8 Here’s a resource: http://t.co/12AQThgwGD (“TOS:didn’t read) They summarize and grade TOS. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @NewsCannon @wjchat Q8 Here’s a resource: http://t.co/12AQThgwGD (“TOS:didn’t read) They summarize and grade TOS. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ONA: Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/JX46djx2EJ Deadline 2/21 #wjch

Anthony Adornato
@AnthonyAdornato


6:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @NewsCannon @wjchat Q8 Here’s a resource: http://t.co/12AQThgwGD (“TOS:didn’t read) They summarize and grade TOS. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@ellynangelotti Ah! :) #wjchat

Martha Kang
@Martha_Kang


6:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@kurtopsahl @wjchat really good point. A TOS isn’t the law of the universe. Sometimes they need to be changed. Only done if ppl read #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:15 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat @ellynangelotti A8 Good point! You can manually put an “X” through an arbitration clause in a consumer/any contract. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:16 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q9 I’m filing a public records request and the agency is being difficult, but I don’t have in-house counsel. What should I do? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @scottleadingham: Interesting. Can audio go viral? NPR experiments with buidling “earworms” for social media: http://t.co/VSmHBmMVyb #w

Silvia Rivera
@illxica


6:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q9 I’m filing a public records request and the agency is being difficult, but I don’t have in-house counsel. What should I do?

Lindsay M Hood
@loolindsayhoo


6:17 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @scottleadingham: Interesting. Can audio go viral? NPR experiments with buidling “earworms” for social media: http://t.co/VSmHBmMVyb #w

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


6:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat See if your state has a Public Access Counselor or advocate http://t.co/YPT6YItXM3 #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat See if your state has a Public Access Counselor or advocate http://t.co/YPT6YItXM3 #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:18 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A9 Often, an attorney can get fees for a successful suit over public records request. You may be able to find one. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A9 Often, an attorney can get fees for a successful suit over public records request. You may be able to find one.

wjchat
@wjchat


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q9 Fun fact: In Hawaii we have the @civilbeat Law Center, a nonprofit to offer free legal assistance to ALL media. #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A9 Student journalists gotta know about Student Press Law Center @SPLC. @FrankLoMonte ftw #wjchat

Dan Hill
@DanHillReports


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @DanHillReports: @wjchat A9 Student journalists gotta know about Student Press Law Center @SPLC. @FrankLoMonte ftw #wjchat

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A9: Muckrock is a great resource to help challenge FOI request denials. https://t.co/GOA4FD5SPq #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat More on the @CivilBeat law center, in @Poynter: http://t.co/vVQt0tR21C #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


6:19 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @GenePark: @wjchat Q9 Fun fact: In Hawaii we have the @civilbeat Law Center, a nonprofit to offer free legal assistance to ALL media. #w

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A9: Muckrock is a great resource to help challenge FOI request denials. https://t.co/GOA4FD5SPq #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
And the @DMLP has a good resource as well: http://t.co/yNM9A5Bu3D #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: And the @DMLP has a good resource as well: http://t.co/yNM9A5Bu3D #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A9: Muckrock is a great resource to help challenge FOI request denials. https://t.co/GOA4FD5SPq #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @DanHillReports: @wjchat A9 Student journalists gotta know about Student Press Law Center @SPLC. @FrankLoMonte ftw #wjchat

Rebecca Roman
@i_Rsquared


6:20 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @GenePark @wjchat More on the @CivilBeat law center, in @Poynter: http://t.co/wwRDvPEsZn #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@DanHillReports definitely a good resource to know about #wjchat!

Samantha Sonner
@SamanthaSonner


6:21 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat no matter what the situation, keep calm, keep calling. Make your face known and keep the powers that be responsible + honest #wjchat

Adam Popescu
@adampopescu


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A9: Get on the phone and explain the law to them. @LATvives & @GottliebJeff did that in Bell, CA. But then they had lawyers. #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Time for the last question! #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Q10 It’s my job to train my newsroom staff. What are some rules for safe social media/web journalist-ing I can impart? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A9: Muckrock is a great resource to help challenge FOI request denials. https://t.co/GOA4FD5SPq #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ONA Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/wD72Ipfzcj Deadline 2/21 #wjchat

Adam Popescu
@adampopescu


6:22 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @adampopescu: RT @ONA Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/wD72Ipfzcj Dea

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


6:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10 Be prepared for every tweet to go viral and be seen all over the world, even if you only meant it for a few people. #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A9: Last shameless promotion for free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA: http://t.co/G7pMbORr8O #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:23 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat your social voice should reflect your real life voice. Only share online what you would IRL. Know your audience.Respect them #wjchat

Adam Popescu
@adampopescu


6:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q10 Keep Statement of Principles in Fair Use for Journos close at hand. http://t.co/YDUXEXuYis. Also follow @uscmedialaw :) #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Q10 An easy rule is NEVER crop credit/copyright notice out of any digital photo, even if you licensed it. Copyright FAIL. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:24 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A10: Use other org’s mishaps as teachable moments: How would your team have responded? How can you prevent it from happening? #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Think & read before you post. It is fair & accurate? How do you KNOW what you are saying? #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q10 An easy rule is NEVER crop credit/copyright notice out of any digital photo, even if you licensed it. Copyrig

wjchat
@wjchat


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A9: Last shameless promotion for free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA: http://t.co/G7pMbORr8O #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A10: Use other org’s mishaps as teachable moments: How would your team have responded? How can you prevent it from happ

wjchat
@wjchat


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @NewsCannon: @wjchat Think & read before you post. It is fair & accurate? How do you KNOW what you are saying? #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:25 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Don’t write something on Twitter you wouldn’t feel comfortable having your byline next to #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10: Work hard, question everything, find the answer yourself, trust your instincts, imagine it were u and rely on lawyers #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A10: Practice sound reporting. Find original content creators and ask permission, back up bold claims w/multiple sources and records #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ShaunaReporter: Any TV reporter that thinks he or she will strictly be on air in 10 years is out of touch. #wjchat

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10 Disclose any personal connection you may have to the story. Be accurate. Check original sources. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A10: Work hard, question everything, find the answer yourself, trust your instincts, imagine it were u and rel

wjchat
@wjchat


6:26 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
#NewhouseSM4 MT @kurtopsahl: Be prepared for tweets to go viral & be seen all over, even if you only meant it for a few people. #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


6:27 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A10: Work hard, question everything, find the answer yourself, trust your instincts, imagine it were u and rel

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:27 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A10: Practice sound reporting. Find original content creators and ask permission, back up bold claims w/multiple source

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:27 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: @moniquebeech good point — online/sm make international laws more relevant and choice of law issues more prevalent. #w

Dan Dakin
@DanDakinMedia


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A10: Make social media part of your internal dialogue — discuss new tools and the challenges with using them. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10 If it’s important to you, keep a copy of it. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ShaunaReporter: Any TV reporter that thinks he or she will strictly be on air in 10 years is out of touch. #wjchat

Ren LaForme
@itsren


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A10: Practice sound reporting. Find original content creators and ask permission, back up bold claims w/multiple source

Ren LaForme
@itsren


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A10: Make social media part of your internal dialogue — discuss new tools and the challenges with using them. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10: Call lawyer early, spend a few hundred. Call lawyer late, spend hundreds of thousands in litigation. #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A10 Be prepared for every tweet to go viral and be seen all over the world, even if you only meant it for a few peo

wjchat
@wjchat


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A10: Call lawyer early, spend a few hundred. Call lawyer late, spend hundreds of thousands in litigation. #wj

wjchat
@wjchat


6:28 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @CShalby: @wjchat Don’t write something on Twitter you wouldn’t feel comfortable having your byline next to #wjchat

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


6:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat A10 Get consent from sources and send a confirming email if possible. (email is a contract – use it) #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
A10: Collaborate to create a set of agreed upon social media guidelines, and revisit them often. #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
How time flies! That wraps up this week’s #wjchat on digital journalism and the law. #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Many, many thanks to our hosts @lisaborodkin, @jacklerner, @ellynangelotti, @LALincolnLawyer + @kurtopsahl #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:29 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat. A pleasure. Until next time… #wjchat

Lincoln Bandlow
@LALincolnLawyer


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Great chat. Let’s do some others on legal issues much to learn and share. #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @ellynangelotti: A10: Make social media part of your internal dialogue — discuss new tools and the challenges with using them. #wjchat

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
And thanks to all of YOU for participating! We’ll see you back here next Wednesday at 5 PST! #wjchat

wjchat
@wjchat


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Thanks, everyone! I learned a lot. See you on Twitter… #wjchat

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Thanks everyone for a great chat! #wjchat

Kurt Opsahl
@kurtopsahl


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@NewsCannon @wjchat We’ve heard from the lawyers – how about accountants next? #wjchat

M. Edward Borasky
@znmeb


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat Very interesting panel! Thanks for hosting a great twitter chat! #wjchat

Leanne DeRosa
@LDeRosa7


6:30 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @GenePark: @wjchat More on the @CivilBeat law center, in @Poynter: http://t.co/vVQt0tR21C #wjchat

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
In the meantime, pitch a host or topic to #wjchat: http://t.co/vcsqlhZwRt

wjchat
@wjchat


6:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @LALincolnLawyer: @wjchat A10: Work hard, question everything, find the answer yourself, trust your instincts, imagine it were u and rel

Jill Cloud
@jill_ashton


6:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat @kurtopsahl @ellynangelotti @jacklerner @LALincolnLawyer Nice #wjchatting with you. Thanks all! #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat One of the best #wjchat in recent memory, and thats saying quite a bit! Aloha!

Gene Park
@GenePark


6:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@LDeRosa7 @wjchat Thanks for joining, Leanne. #wjchat

Lisa Borodkin
@lisaborodkin


6:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
+1 Understanding $ is important RT @znmeb: @NewsCannon @wjchat We’ve heard from the lawyers – how about accountants next? #wjchat

William Cannon
@NewsCannon


6:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat So much fun. Thanks for having me. Can’t wait until next time! #wjchat

Jack Lerner
@jacklerner


6:32 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@lisaborodkin @wjchat @kurtopsahl @ellynangelotti @jacklerner @LALincolnLawyer Mahalo from Hawaii! #wjchat

Gene Park
@GenePark


6:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@wjchat thanks for the discussion! #wjchat

Colleen Shalby
@CShalby


6:34 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Just had a great @wjchat on media law with @lisaborodkin, @lalincolnlawyer, @kurtopsahl, @ellynangelotti. Go to #wjchat for the archive!

Media Law inthe News
@USCMediaLaw


6:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @USCMediaLaw: Just had a great @wjchat on media law with @lisaborodkin, @lalincolnlawyer, @kurtopsahl, @ellynangelotti. Go to #wjchat fo

Ellyn Angelotti
@ellynangelotti


6:35 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @wjchat: Q10 It’s my job to train my newsroom staff. What are some rules for safe social media/web journalist-ing I can impart? #wjchat

Clydeen McDonald
@ClydeenMcDonald


6:36 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @USCMediaLaw: Just had a great @wjchat on media law with @lisaborodkin, @lalincolnlawyer, @kurtopsahl, @ellynangelotti. Go to #wjchat fo

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:37 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @USCMediaLaw: Just had a great @wjchat on media law with @lisaborodkin, @lalincolnlawyer, @kurtopsahl, @ellynangelotti. Go to #wjchat fo

Guillaume Dumont
@GuillaumeDumont


6:38 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
@CShalby @wjchat Yes, the #wjchat discussion on social media & journalism was enlightening, practical, very useful, much appreciated!

Democracy Watch News
@dwatchnews


6:39 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @kurtopsahl: @wjchat A10 Be prepared for every tweet to go viral and be seen all over the world, even if you only meant it for a few peo

Cindy Reves, CJE
@CindyReves


6:56 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
Fantastic resource MT @ellynangelotti: shameless promotion free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA http://t.co/B1s96qgxbB #wjchat

David Ardia
@dsardia


7:12 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q10 An easy rule is NEVER crop credit/copyright notice out of any digital photo, even if you licensed it. Copyrig

Mark Loundy
@MarkLoundy


7:13 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @lisaborodkin: @wjchat Q10 An easy rule is NEVER crop credit/copyright notice out of any digital photo, even if you licensed it. Copyrig

Jay Westcott
@jwestcottphoto


7:14 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @dsardia: Fantastic resource MT @ellynangelotti: shameless promotion free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA http://t.co/B1s96

nabihasyed
@nabihasyed


7:31 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @dsardia: Fantastic resource MT @ellynangelotti: shameless promotion free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA http://t.co/B1s96

Laura (Norton) Amico
@LauraNorton


7:33 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @dsardia: Fantastic resource MT @ellynangelotti: shameless promotion free, relevant training – @newsu’s course on FOIA http://t.co/B1s96

Michelle Holmes
@mlh_holmes


7:55 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @adampopescu: RT @ONA Are you a student journalist experimenting w/ new tech? Apply to be an #APGoogleScholar http://t.co/wD72Ipfzcj Dea

Ashley Hill
@prepforcollege


8:03 p.m. PST | 02.05.2014
RT @scottleadingham: Interesting. Can audio go viral? NPR experiments with buidling “earworms” for social media: http://t.co/VSmHBmMVyb #w

Dan Grech
@dgrech


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *